This article is available at the URI https://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/28/ as part of the NYU Library's Ancient World Digital Library in partnership with the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World (ISAW). More information about ISAW Papers is available on the ISAW website.

©2024 Christián C. Carmen and Dennis Duke; distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY) license.
Creative Commons License

This article can be downloaded as a single file.

ISAW Papers 28 (2024)

Tables of Lunar and Solar Eclipses from -800 to 1650 Using Modern and Almagest Models

Christián C. Carman, (UNQ, CONICET) and Dennis Duke, Florida State University
Permanent URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2333.1/m37pw0dp
Abstract: This article describes and makes available computed data for lunar and solar eclipses for the time period -800 to 1650.
Library of Congress Subjects: Astronomy, Greek; Ptolemy, active 2nd century.

We have computed the lunar and solar eclipses for the time period -800 to 1650. The events are computed using modern models Elp2000/82 for the Sun (Bretagnon 1986) and VSOP87d for the Moon (Chapront-Touze 1983), and the ancient models from Ptolemy’s Almagest (Pedersen 2011). Often in discussions of ancient astronomy it is helpful to be able to look up directly the time and circumstances of specific eclipses as seen from a specific geographical location for both modern models and the Almagest models, so that is what our tables provide.

Our calculations of lunar eclipses using the modern models are straightforward. One first finds the moment of mean opposition and then, using a simple bracket search, the moment of true opposition. Then using modern values (Meeus 1998, Chapter 55) for the size and distance of the Sun and Moon and the radius σ of the Earth’s shadow at the distance of the Moon, one searches for, in turn, the moment when the Moon first touches the umbra, then when the Moon is totally within the umbra, then when the Moon is at minimum distance 𝜌o from the shadow center, then when the Moon first exits the umbra, then when the Moon last touches the umbra. The eclipse magnitude is then given by
m = σ ρ 0 + r M 2 r M
where rM is the radius of the Moon.

The calculation of lunar eclipses using the Almagest models is similar. The moment of mean opposition is related to the moment t of true opposition by t = t̅ + δt where
δ t = q S ( a S ( t ) ) q M ( a M ( t ) ) η + ω a d q M d α M | t = t ω S d q S d α S | t = t
qs and qM are the equations of center with arguments aS and aM for the Sun and Moon, η and ωα are the mean motion in elongation and anomaly of the Moon, and ωS is the mean motion in longitude of Sun.

The calculation of solar eclipses is similar to the calculation of lunar eclipses except that (a) we look for mean and true conjunction instead of opposition, and (b) we must correct the coordinates of the Moon and Sun for parallax. For the modern models, the distance to the Sun is so large that the solar parallax can be completely neglected. For the Almagest models the solar parallax is small, but not entirely negligible, so following Ptolemy we include it. For the modern models we use analytic formulas for the parallax in ecliptical longitude and latitude (Meeus 1998, 282). For the Almagest models we use formulas that Ptolemy attributes to Hipparchus
π λ = π h cos ψ π β = π h sin ψ
where πh is the horizontal parallax of the Moon and ψ is the angle of the ecliptic with the altitude circle that passes through the Moon at geocentric altitude h:
cos ψ = 1 tan ( 90 h ) tan ( λ H λ M )
where λH is the degree of the ecliptic rising at the time of the eclipse, and is given by
tan λ H = sin ϵ tan ϕ cos ϵ sin θ cos θ
where ϴ is the local sidereal time and ε is the obliquity of the ecliptic.

It is true that πλ and πβ as just computed are only approximations, but contrary to what Ptolemy says in the Almagest they are pretty good approximations. In some circumstances it happens that due to the approximations cosψ is greater than 1 or less than -1, and this leads to the occasional NaN (not a number) entries in columns BE-BM.

So for solar eclipses one computes the (approximate) time of conjunction as the moment when
λ S = λ M = λ M + π λ
and then the magnitude of the eclipse is given by
λ S = λ M = λ M + π λ
where β'M = βM + πβ is the apparent latitude of the Moon at the latitude PHI of the observer.

Archival Version of Spradsheets of Computed Data for Lunar and Solar eclipses

Four Microsoft Excel spreadsheets are available in an archive at New York University. The files are compressed into a single, downloadable .zip file. The permanent URL for accessing this material is: https://hdl.handle.net/2451/74683. The file names within the .zip file are as follows:

Guide to the lunar eclipse spreadsheet columns

Column(s)Content
A-Cyear, month, day for the opposition of the Moon and Sun
DET for the modern models or local time for the Almagest models, for the opposition
E-Fmean anomaly α of the Sun and Moon
Gmean distance of the Moon from its ascending node
H-Ithe equation q = λ - λ̅ of the Sun and Moon (true minus mean longitude)
J-Mthe equatorial horizontal parallax π and semidiameter r of the Sun and Moon
Nthe shadow radius (in degrees) 𝜎 = 1.01πM - rs + πs at the distance of the Moon
O-Pthe derivative dq / dα of the Sun and Moon
Qthe speed of the Moon relative to the Sun at opposition
RET at opposition
SET at the approximate moment of maximum eclipse
Tthe eclipse magnitude m = (𝜎 - 𝜌0 + rM) / 2rM
U𝜌0 is the distance of the Moon’s center from the shadow center
V-W𝜌1 = 𝜎 + rM and 𝜌2 = 𝜎 - rM
Xthe moment when the Moon first touches the umbra
Ythe moment when the Moon is totally within the umbra
Zthe moment when the Moon is at minimum distance from the shadow center
AAthe moment when the Moon first exits the umbra
ABthe moment when the Moon last touches the umbra
AC-AEthe longitude, latitude, and distance of the Moon at the moment of maximum eclipse
AF𝛥T = ET - UT

Guide to the solar eclipse spreadsheet columns

Column(s)Content
A-Cyear, month, and day for the conjunction of the Moon and Sun
D-Egeographical longitude and latitude of the observer
FUT for the conjunction
G-Hmean anomaly α of the Sun and the local sidereal time Θ
I-Jmean anomaly of the Moon and the mean distance from its ascending node
K-Lthe equation q = λ - λ̅ of the Sun and Moon (true minus mean longitude)
M-Rthe equatorial horizontal parallax π and the true and parallax corrected semidiameter r of the Sun and Moon
S-Tthe derivative dq / dα of the Sun and Moon
Uthe speed of the Moon relative to the Sun at opposition
Vthe eclipse magnitude
W𝜌0 is the distance of the Moon’s center from the shadow center
X-Y𝜌1 = 𝜎 + r and 𝜌2 = 𝜎 - r
Zthe moment when the Moon first touches the umbra
AAthe moment when the Moon is totally within the umbra
ABthe moment when the Moon is at minimum distance from the shadow center
ACthe moment when the Moon first exits the umbra
ADthe moment when the Moon last touches the umbra
AE-AKthe true longitude, latitude, distance, right ascension, declination, azimuth, and altitude of the Sun at the moment of maximum eclipse
AL-AQas above for the Sun but parallax corrected
AR-AXthe longitude, latitude, distance from Earth, right ascension, declination, azimuth, and altitude of the Moon at the moment of maximum eclipse
AY-BDas above for the Moon but parallax corrected
BE-BFthe parallax corrected longitude and latitude of the Moon using Hipparchus’ approximation.
BG-BMthe degree of the ecliptic λʜ rising at the time of the eclipse, the angle Ψ of the ecliptic with the altitude circle that passes through the Moon, all at the time of maximum eclipse
BN-BOthe parallax corrected longitude and latitude of the Sun using Hipparchus’ approximation.
BP-BVthe degree of the ecliptic λʜ rising at the time of the eclipse, the angle Ψ of the ecliptic with the altitude circle that passes through the Sun, all at the time of maximum eclipse
BW-CBthe true parallax corrections in longitude, latitude, right ascension, declination, azimuth and altitude for the Moon
CC𝛥T = ET - UT for the modern models

References

Pierre Bretagnon, Francou G., "Planetary Theories in rectangular and spherical variables: VSOP87 solution", Astron. Astrophys., vol. 202, no. 309 (1988).

Chapront-Touze, M. and Chapront, J., "The Lunar Ephemeris ELP 2000", Astron. and Astrophys. vol. 124, no. 1, pp 50-62 (1983).

Jean Meeus 1998, Astronomical Algorithms, 2nd edition, Willmann-Bell, Richmond.

Noel Swerdlow 2004, Planetary, Stellar, and Lunar Visibility, v 3.1, www.alcyone.de, by Rainer Lange and Noel Swerdlow.

Olaf Pederson 2011, A Survey of the Almagest, with Annotation and New Commentary by Alexander Jones, Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Springer, New York.

Carl Schoch 1924, The “Arcus Visionis” of the Planets in the Babylonian Observations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 84, Issue 9, 14 July 731-734.

Gerald J. Toomer 1984, Ptolemy’s Almagest, translated and Annotated, Duckworth, London.